DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2008-140
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FINAL DECISION
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section 425 of
title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the case on May 23, 2008, upon receipt
of the applicant’s completed application, and assigned it to staff member J. Andrews to pre-
pare the decision for the Board as required by 33 C.F.R. § 52.61(c).
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated February 26, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to correct his records to show that upon his enlistment he
disenrolled himself from eligibility for educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill
(MGIB)1 and to order the Coast Guard to stop deducting his allotments and to reimburse him for
allotments already deducted from his pay.
The applicant alleged that he was miscounseled about how to disenroll from the MGIB
program during boot camp. He alleged that the yeoman who counseled him advised him to sign
block 2 if he wanted to disenroll, so he did. He later learned that he was supposed to sign block
5 of the form to disenroll.
In support of this allegation, the applicant submitted copies of e-mail messages indicating
that the Personnel Services Center could not stop his MGIB allotment because he had not signed
1 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq. Under 38 U.S.C. § 3011(b), upon enlistment on active duty, a member is automatically
enrolled for MGIB benefits and deductions are made from his basic pay, unless the member makes an election under
subsection (c)(1). Subsection 3011(c)(1) states that a member “may make an election not to receive educational
assistance under this chapter. Any such election shall be made at the time the individual initially enters active duty
as a member of the Armed Forces. Any individual who makes such an election is not entitled to educational
assistance under this chapter.” Under 38 U.S.C. § 3011(b), unless members purposefully disenroll themselves from
the program at the time they first enlist on active duty, the Service deducts $100 from their pay each month for the
first 12 months or until at total of $1,200 has been deducted, and they become eligible for educational benefits.
the form properly to disenroll. The e-mails also indicate that the applicant believed that he was
ineligible because of his prior service in the National Guard, but that service in the National
Guard is not “qualifying service” and does not render someone ineligible for MGIB benefits.
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD
On December 4, 2007, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard. He had previously
served in the Army National Guard of Ohio for six years. On the day he enlisted, the applicant
and his recruiter signed a “Statement of Understanding for Four Year Active Service: Montgom-
ery G.I. Bill (MGIB,” which stated the following:
I am eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) based upon my initial entry on active
1.
duty on or after 01 July 1985.
2.
month for each of the first full 12 months of active duty.
3.
refund of my money under any circumstances.
4.
I am automatically enrolled in the MGIB and my basic pay will be reduced by $100 per
I cannot suspend or stop my monthly pay reduction under the MGIB and there is no
Complete 48 months of active duty.
Complete my high school education (or receive an equivalency certificate before
To be eligible for benefits, I must do all of the following:
•
•
the end of my initial enlistment. …
•
My benefit will be a minimum of $300 per month for 36 months (minimum total of
Receive an honorable discharge.
5.
$10,800) although the monthly amount may vary from year to year.
6.
7.
I am eligible to use my benefits in-service after two years on active duty.
I may use my benefits at colleges, universities …
However, contrary to the above Statement of Understanding, while at boot camp on
December 17, 2007, the applicant signed a Basic Enrollment form, DD 2366, for the MGIB in
block 2.a. Block 2.a. is for members who are ineligible for MGIB benefits because they disen-
rolled when enlisting on active duty at some time in the past or because they have already
received educational benefits through a Service academy or the ROTC. The applicant’s signa-
ture in block 2.a. was witnessed by a first class yeoman as the certifying official. The Basic
Enrollment form appears in the applicant’s record as follows in pertinent part:
2. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR INELIGIBLE MEMBERS
I am NOT eligible for the MGIB because (a) I am a service academy graduate, or (b) I am an ROTC scholarship
graduate who received more than the current minimum amount allowed for enrollment in MGIB, or (c) I am a prior
service member who disenrolled during my previous term of active duty.
a. SERVICE MEMBER SIGNATURE
[The applicant signed this block.]
c. DATE SIGNED (YYYYMMDD)
20071217
b. RANK/GRADE
SR/E-3
3. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR ALL ELIGIBLE MEMBERS
(1) I am automatically enrolled unless I exercise the option to DISENROLL by signing item 5 below.
(2) UNLESS I DISENROLL from the MGIB, my basic pay will be reduced $100 per month, or the current monthly
rate until $1,200 has been deducted; this basic pay reduction CANNOT be REFUNDED, SUSPENDED OR
STOPPED, this is an IRREVOCABLE DECISION.
[Items (3) through (10) omitted.]
(a) Service Member Signature
(b) Rank/Grade
(c) Date Signed
4. SERVICE UNIQUE EDUCATION ASSISTANCE OPTIONS
5. STATEMENT OF DISENROLLMENT
I DO NOT desire to participate in the MGIB. I understand the benefits of the MGIB program and that I WILL NOT be
able to enroll at a later date.
a. DATE SIGNED (YYYYMMDD)
c. SERVICE MEMBER SIGNATURE
b. RANK/GRADE
a. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME
[Name omitted.]
6. CERTIFYING OFFICIAL
b. RANK/GRADE
YN1/E-6
c. SIGNATURE
[Signed.]
d. DATE SIGNED
(YYYYMMDD)
2007Dec17
The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statements show that $100 was deducted from his
pay each month for the MGIB program after he completed boot camp.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On October 14, 2008, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted
an advisory opinion in which he adopted the findings and analysis provided in a memorandum
on the case prepared by the Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC). CGPC recommended
that the Board grant relief by ordering the Coast Guard to ensure that the applicant is
properly counseled regarding his MGIB entitlement and be afforded the opportunity to elect either
to participate in the MGIB or disenrollment from the MGIB. The applicant should make such
election on DD Form 2366 as though he had made such election on December 17, 2007. If the
applicant elects disenrollment, the Coast Guard should suspend further contributions and refund
any amounts paid under the erroneously executed DD Form 2366.
CGPC stated that the applicant’s DD 2366 was completed erroneously to indicate that the
applicant was not eligible for MGIB benefits and yet was signed by a certifying official. In this
regard, CGPC submitted a copy of Enclosure (1) to COMDTINST 1760.9A, which provides the
eligibility criteria for the MGIB program. Paragraph 1.A. states that to be eligible, “Service
members must have entered on active duty for the first time on or after 1 July 1985. Periods of
Initial Entry Training (IADT) and Annual Training (AT) of former members of Reserve Com-
ponents do not count as active duty when determining eligibility to participate in the MGIB pro-
gram.”2
2 Title 38 U.S.C. § 3002 states the following regarding what counts as “active duty” for the purpose of the MGIB
program:
(6) The term “active duty” does not include any period during which an individual … (C) served
under the provisions of section 12103(d) of title 10 pursuant to an enlistment in the Army National
Guard or the Air National Guard, or as a Reserve for service in the Army Reserve, Navy Reserve,
Air Force Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, or Coast Guard Reserve.
(7) The term “active duty” includes full-time National Guard duty first performed after June 30,
1985, by a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of
the United States in the member’s status as a member of the National Guard of a State for the
purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the National Guard.
CGPC further stated that “[s]ince the applicant indicated that he was ineligible and the
Coast Guard certified such, he made no further election regarding either accepting or declining
MGIB.” CGPC noted that under Chapter 7.E.2. of the Pay Manual, “[e]ligible members are
automatically enrolled [in MGIB] unless they elect not to receive educational benefits within the
first 2 weeks of active duty.” Therefore, because the applicant actually was eligible for MGIB
benefits and because he did not disenroll by signing the DD 2366 in block 5, his enrollment in
the MGIB program and the deductions from his pay were automatic under the law.
CGPC concluded that the Coast Guard “improperly certified that the applicant was not
eligible to participate in the MGIB at the time of execution of the DD Form 2366. Since subse-
quent inquiry determined that the applicant was in fact eligible for the MGIB, the DD Form 2236
is in error.” CGPC noted that under Article 5.3. of DOD Directive 1332.16, all eligible members
must be counseled about MGIB benefits and given an opportunity to disenroll from the program
within 2 weeks of their enlistment on active duty.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On October 16, 2008, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the Coast Guard’s advisory
opinion and invited him to respond within 30 days. No response was received.
2.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's
military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and applicable law:
The Board has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552. The
application was timely because it was filed within three years of the applicant’s discovery of the
alleged error in his record, as required by 10 U.S.C. § 1552(b).
1.
The applicant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was errone-
ously counseled about his MGIB eligibility during boot camp. His Basic Enrollment form, DD
2236, is erroneous in that it indicates that he was ineligible for MGIB benefits. Under 38 U.S.C.
§ 3002, the applicant was eligible for MGIB benefits when he enlisted in the Coast Guard
because he had never served on “active duty” as defined in that statute. The first class yeoman
who was responsible for counseling the applicant, however, certified this erroneous form with his
signature. Because of this misinformation, the applicant was deprived of the opportunity man-
dated under 38 U.S.C. § 3011(c)(1) to disenroll from the MGIB program, and $100 allotments
have been deducted from his pay each month without his consent. Moreover, the Board notes
that it is possible that the applicant was not fully informed of the benefits of the MGIB program
because the counselor apparently believed that the applicant was ineligible. Therefore, the Board
finds that the relief recommended by CGPC is appropriate in this case.
Accordingly, relief should be granted by affording the applicant proper counseling
regarding his MGIB benefits and also the opportunity to elect either to participate in the MGIB
program or to disenroll from it. The applicant should make this election on a DD Form 2366 as
3.
though he had made it on December 17, 2007. If the applicant elects disenrollment, the Coast
Guard should stop further MGIB deductions from his pay and refund any amounts paid under the
erroneously executed DD Form 2366. In addition, the erroneous DD Form 2366 should be
removed from his record.
[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]
The application of SN xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of his military record
is granted as follows:
ORDER
The Coast Guard shall provide him accurate counseling about MGIB benefits and his
eligibility for them. After this counseling, he shall be afforded an opportunity to elect on a new
DD Form 2366 either to participate in the MGIB program or to disenroll from it, and this
election shall be made as though he had made it on December 17, 2007. The Coast Guard shall
remove the old, erroneous DD Form 2236, which he signed in block 2.a., from his record.
Randall J. Kaplan
If he elects disenrollment from the MGIB program by signing block 5.c. of the new
DD Form 2366, the Coast Guard shall stop deducting MGIB allotments from his pay and shall
refund to him any allotments previously deducted from his pay for the MGIB.
Ryan J. Wedlund
Dorothy J. Ulmer
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2005-016
This final decision, dated November 17, 2005, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his records to make him eligible for educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)1 by correcting his form DD Form 2366 to show that he elected to accept the benefits. Based on the review of your official Coast Guard records, you did complete a DD Form 2366 on 10 April 2001, electing not to participate in the MGIB. Within two...
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2003-149
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. • a copy of his Allotment Worksheet dated April 24, 2001, requesting a monthly deduction of $180.00 from his base pay and total deduction of $2,700.00 for his MGIB account; In support of his allegations, the applicant submitted the following: • a copy of his form DD 2366 dated April 24, 2001, with his signature in block 3(a),...
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2000-054
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. This final decision, dated October 12, 2000, is signed by the three duly RELIEF REQUESTED The applicant, a seaman apprentice (SA; pay grade E-2) who served 20 months on active duty in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct his records so that the Coast Guard would repay him the $1,200.00 that was withheld from his pay under the Montgomery GI...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 1998-055
This final decision, dated June 15, 2000, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S ORIGINAL ALLEGATIONS AND REQUESTED RELIEF The applicant, a former xxxxxxxxxx, asked the Board to correct her record by changing the separation code (SPD code) and narrative reason for discharge in blocks 26 and 28, respectively, on the DD 214 discharge form issued upon her release from active duty. On August 15, 1991, the applicant signed another statement of under- standing regarding MGIB (form DD 2366) with...
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2007-069
The applicant stated that she declined participation in the MGIB program while in the Coast Guard because she thought she was entitled to benefits based on her previous enrollment in the program during the eight months she was in the Navy. I understand the benefits of the MGIB program and that I will not be able to enroll at a later date.’ VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On March 1, 2007, the JAG submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny relief. CGPC stated that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511922C070209
Once enrolled in the New GI Bill the individual's basic pay was reduced $100.00 per month for each of the first full 12 months of active duty and the deductions could not be refunded, suspended or stopped. The applicants contention that he was in the military for about 12 months before MGIB contributions were deducted from his pay is true. Reservists and Guardsmen not on extended active duty do not have MGIB contributions deducted from their pay.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04532
She was informed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Education Office that her separation code needs to be changed to reflect COG so the DVA can consider her eligibility for the MGIB. She was advised that the DVA will only consider her application if her separation code is changed to COG. She voluntarily separated under the FY04 Force Shaping Program; was offered the MGIB prior to separating and wants to use the benefit she paid into. However, according to the DVA letter dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077424C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 June 1998, he signed the same form disenrolling from the MGIB program. The applicant by his signature disenrolled from the MGIB program and his monthly pay was not reduced by $100.00, as required for enrollment.
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-144
(2) of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual provides that a member may receive a general discharge “[w]hen based on the individual’s overall military record or the severity of the incident(s) which results in discharge, Commander, (CGPC-epm-1) directs issuing a general discharge.” On June 21, 2002, the applicant received a general discharge “under honorable condi- tions” for misconduct with an RE-4 reenlistment code (ineligible for reenlistment). If the member requests counsel and one is not...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03220 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 APRIL 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to stop his participation in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program and he receive back pay for the MGIB deductions he has paid. Although the applicant...